Kids are learning about drug use first hand, right out in the open. Even though we have the D. Program, this opens up kids curiosity who never knew about drugs at all. I remember when I was in school, I had never heard about drugs to that extent until D.. Officers came and talked to us.
Many of us had never heard of huffing by the end of the day everybody was sniffing their markers, just to see what the officer was talking about. The point that Hamill should have been point out should have been that TV glorifies drugs if he wanted to use the facts stated in his article.
He could have also stated that drugs are a two headed dragon, building up lives on one side and tearing them down on the other. But when it all comes together the wrath of the two-headed drug dragon is very destructive in the end. Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.
Blog at WordPress. Tihesa's Blog. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here In the essay Pete Hammil states that he has interviewedmany people with drug problems and that none of them know why they do it theyjust give him a look like it makes me happy. The essay was veryinformative I thought, but I fail to see where the writer effectively sets forthethos, pathos, and logos. There was not enough evidence to back the story up tomake it believable.
It was more of an opinion paper that might convince peoplethat are looking for something to believe about the drug problem and why itexists. Although there is a connection between the two. Television is an escapefrom reality as are drugs.
But I dont think that they can be linked to eachother because they are 2 different worlds. The facts that are statedthroughout the essay are a good way to apply ethos, pathos, and logos, although, they are not convincing enough to make a believer out of everyone who readsthe paper. Hamills claim is inferred in my opinion, it is in the middle ofthe paragraph and it is Hamill thinking and he then comes to a conclusion thatseems to be the claim.
Now ethos is applied when Hamill is telling the story inthe beginning about the woman on drugs. The story supports Ethos and makes itemotionally appealing for the reader, so the reader will be interested rightaway. The warrants are stated as facts throughout the essay, by stating factswhen analyzing TV and drugs. The end of the story also has a sub claim ofpolicy, by asking the question what can be done referring to the drugproblem and TV addiction.
The sub claim of policy is backed up by suggestingways to better peoples understanding on TV and its effects ,the drugproblem , and taking action on the issues that Hamill presents.
The end ofthe story has a sub claim of policy as stated earlier. Which is a stated claimwhen Hamill states for years the defenders of television have argued that thenetworks are only giving people what they want.
That might be true. But so isthe Medellin Cartel. This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly.
Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report. Accessed January 14, In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match. Home Essays Database. Academic anxiety? Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task.
Get your paper price experts online. Henri Cartier-Bresson. Essay about James Dean. Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?
0コメント